Threats / Rejetto / CVE-2024-23692
CVE-2024-23692
· EUVD no mirror located
· GCVE no mirror located
Verified 2026-09-19
Rejetto HTTP File Server vulnerability
Rejetto HTTP File Server contains a template injection vulnerability allowing remote, unauthenticated command execution via specially crafted HTTP requests.
Verdict
Today item, not a backlog item.
A remote attacker can exploit improper neutralization of template engine elements to execute arbitrary commands on vulnerable HTTP File Server instances without authentication. Active exploitation in the wild increases operational risk.
CISA KEV Yes · 2024-07-095Ransomware use Flagged5EPSS 0.99471 (verify live)6Exploit Weaponized · public PoC7CVSS 9.83CISA SSVC Exploitation: active · Automatable: yes · Impact: total4
01
Is it exploitable?
— the evidence, ranked above the scoreExploit available
Fully weaponized — public exploit code is cataloged for this vulnerability.We link the existence of the exploit; we do not host or redistribute payloads.
Reported exploitation
367 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2024-07-09), flagged for known ransomware use.
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.99471 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
CVSS 9.8 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) · Affected: Rejetto, HTTP File Server. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.CVSS — CNA-assigned (CVE.org), version 3.1, set at disclosure.
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-1336 Template Injection — weakness family: Injection.CWE — CNA-assigned (CVE.org); the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
CISA SSVC (triage disposition)
Exploitation: active · Automatable: yes · Technical Impact: totalCISA's own stakeholder-specific triage inputs, published in the CVE record (CISA Coordinator role). NOTE: this is CISA's three decision points; the final Act/Attend/Track decision also requires a Mission & Well-being input not published here, so no overall decision is asserted.
Currency of the record
CISA added this to its KEV catalog 39 days after the CVE record was published.KEV lag = CISA-KEV dateAdded − CVE.org datePublished; a floor on how long the known-exploited flaw sat in the public record before the federal catalog listed it. Severity/weakness here is CNA- or CISA-assigned (current at disclosure), independent of NVD's analysis backlog.
Public exploit available
Public exploit tooling is catalogued for this CVE (a functional/weaponized public exploit). Catalog entries: Metasploit module, nuclei template. We link the catalog page(s) only — no payload or code is hosted or restated here.Link, never host — the catalog page is the source; basicsecurity.net does not redistribute payloads.
02
Who’s exploiting it?
— attribution turns risk into urgencyAttribution not established
No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.
03
Why it matters
— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board1
Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1
Attacker
I craft an HTTP request containing template injection payloads targeting the server's template engine.
Business
Exposed HTTP File Server instances become entry points for unauthorized system access and command execution.
2
Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2
Attacker
I send the malicious request to the vulnerable server without requiring credentials or authentication.
Business
The lack of authentication requirements means any internet-facing instance is immediately exploitable by threat actors.
3
Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3
Attacker
I execute arbitrary system commands through the template injection, gaining control over the affected host.
Business
Attackers can establish persistence, exfiltrate data, deploy malware, or pivot to internal network resources.
04
What to do
— defensible action- Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05
Coverage & confidence
— what we know, and what we don’tEstablished (cited)
Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden
Disclosure & credit2
Catalogued by VulnCheckCNA
Credited with finding itArseniy Sharoglazovfinder
Found an error? Propose a correction.
A correction is a cited counter-claim — it must cite a source,
gets reviewed by a second human, and is never auto-applied. See the
correction convention and our identity
npub1j7gt9ky7sfcrjn8jjee6693dkzvk4rahs0fk2suu7968dfns62zs3mqm3y.